<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bing &#8211; a better way to search?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomdoyletalk.com/2009/06/02/bing-a-better-way-to-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomdoyletalk.com/2009/06/02/bing-a-better-way-to-search/</link>
	<description>TALK</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:50:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Doyle</title>
		<link>http://www.tomdoyletalk.com/2009/06/02/bing-a-better-way-to-search/comment-page-1/#comment-4145</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Doyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 10:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomdoyletalk.com/?p=1246#comment-4145</guid>
		<description>That is so not true Carmen. 

Talk a look at any of the competitive search terms. Bing is full of spam sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is so not true Carmen. </p>
<p>Talk a look at any of the competitive search terms. Bing is full of spam sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carmen Gomez</title>
		<link>http://www.tomdoyletalk.com/2009/06/02/bing-a-better-way-to-search/comment-page-1/#comment-4142</link>
		<dc:creator>Carmen Gomez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 06:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomdoyletalk.com/?p=1246#comment-4142</guid>
		<description>BING search engine is just as good as Google. In my own personal experience, Google does give more releveant search result than Bing but the difference is very small.                 **</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BING search engine is just as good as Google. In my own personal experience, Google does give more releveant search result than Bing but the difference is very small.                 **</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jade</title>
		<link>http://www.tomdoyletalk.com/2009/06/02/bing-a-better-way-to-search/comment-page-1/#comment-3987</link>
		<dc:creator>Jade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomdoyletalk.com/?p=1246#comment-3987</guid>
		<description>Bing does give search results much like Google but i would have to say that Google still gives more relevant search results</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing does give search results much like Google but i would have to say that Google still gives more relevant search results</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Doyle</title>
		<link>http://www.tomdoyletalk.com/2009/06/02/bing-a-better-way-to-search/comment-page-1/#comment-3909</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Doyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomdoyletalk.com/?p=1246#comment-3909</guid>
		<description>@Acneboy - They&#039;re not even close!! Don&#039;t think Google will have much competition from Bing at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Acneboy &#8211; They&#8217;re not even close!! Don&#8217;t think Google will have much competition from Bing at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Acneboy</title>
		<link>http://www.tomdoyletalk.com/2009/06/02/bing-a-better-way-to-search/comment-page-1/#comment-3904</link>
		<dc:creator>Acneboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomdoyletalk.com/?p=1246#comment-3904</guid>
		<description>Bing search engine gives almost the same search results as Google. Looks like Google will now have a tough competition when it comes to search engine technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing search engine gives almost the same search results as Google. Looks like Google will now have a tough competition when it comes to search engine technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irish Internet Marketing Blogs Round Up &#124; Online Advertising</title>
		<link>http://www.tomdoyletalk.com/2009/06/02/bing-a-better-way-to-search/comment-page-1/#comment-3751</link>
		<dc:creator>Irish Internet Marketing Blogs Round Up &#124; Online Advertising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomdoyletalk.com/?p=1246#comment-3751</guid>
		<description>[...] Doyle of 2bscene has interesting comments on Microsofts new search engine Bing. Further Bing chatter can be found on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Doyle of 2bscene has interesting comments on Microsofts new search engine Bing. Further Bing chatter can be found on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Coleman</title>
		<link>http://www.tomdoyletalk.com/2009/06/02/bing-a-better-way-to-search/comment-page-1/#comment-3748</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomdoyletalk.com/?p=1246#comment-3748</guid>
		<description>If Microsoft were to offer standard agency discounts of 15%, as do the majority of web publishers (but not Google), they may find a lot of agencys are motivated to educate advertisers on the benefits of advertising on Bing.  

The most obvious Bing benefit is probable lower Cost Per Acquisitions than Google. Fewer advertisers equals lower cost per clicks equals lower Cost Per Acquisition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Microsoft were to offer standard agency discounts of 15%, as do the majority of web publishers (but not Google), they may find a lot of agencys are motivated to educate advertisers on the benefits of advertising on Bing.  </p>
<p>The most obvious Bing benefit is probable lower Cost Per Acquisitions than Google. Fewer advertisers equals lower cost per clicks equals lower Cost Per Acquisition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
