<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mugurdy &#8211; The New Irish (made) Search Engine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomdoyletalk.com/2009/10/29/mugurdy-the-new-irish-made-search-engine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomdoyletalk.com/2009/10/29/mugurdy-the-new-irish-made-search-engine/</link>
	<description>TALK</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:50:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Barry Hand</title>
		<link>http://www.tomdoyletalk.com/2009/10/29/mugurdy-the-new-irish-made-search-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-4010</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Hand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomdoyletalk.com/?p=1458#comment-4010</guid>
		<description>Similarly fully visual search isn&#039;t for me either, although I do appreciate a mixture of data source represented visually in an organised way (like ask.com)

I&#039;m not sure what Mugurdy is, seems like someone&#039;s hobby and a proof of concept because it likes so much to be considered seriously (awful name, logo, tagline, UI etc.)

Agree on the investment point, I&#039;ve seen companies get investment and have just got a copy cat idea, and in one particular case a fully copy cat website to match!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Similarly fully visual search isn&#8217;t for me either, although I do appreciate a mixture of data source represented visually in an organised way (like ask.com)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what Mugurdy is, seems like someone&#8217;s hobby and a proof of concept because it likes so much to be considered seriously (awful name, logo, tagline, UI etc.)</p>
<p>Agree on the investment point, I&#8217;ve seen companies get investment and have just got a copy cat idea, and in one particular case a fully copy cat website to match!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
